Garcia, Lagana, Andrzejczak & Moriarty Continue to Push Bill to Protect Consumer Privacy & Prevent Identity Fraud

Bill Stems from Concerns about Info Collected when Driver’s License is Scanned

(TRENTON) – Legislation sponsored by Assembly Democrats Carmelo Garcia, Joseph Lagana, Bob Andrzejczak and Paul Moriarty to help protect sensitive consumer information continues to advance.
The bill, called the Personal Information and Privacy Protection Act, was prompted by recent reports about the personal information that is collected when a driver’s license is scanned and how that information is stored and used by businesses.
It was approved 77-0-1 Thursday by the Assembly.
“Driver’s licenses contain personal information that in the wrong hands can create major financial headaches for the person affected,” said Garcia (D-Hudson). “With so many security breaches at stores like Target and Home Depot, it is wise that we set limits on how much personal information these companies can collect from customers in order to minimize the potential for identity fraud.”
“Consumers are expected to trust companies and their employees with sensitive information, but how can we be sure that this information is being guarded properly?” asked Andrzejczak (D-Cape May/Atlantic/Cumberland). “Unless it falls under one of the exceptions mandated in the bill, there is no reason for a company to scan your license and have access to your personal information.”
“Consumers should not have to worry about their personal information possibly ending up in the wrong hands every time they go shopping,” said Lagana (D-Bergen/Passaic). “Technological advances have made it harder to protect our privacy. This bill can help ensure that businesses are only scanning driver’s licenses under certain circumstances and that only certain information is stored.”
“As consumers, we often hand over personal information without thinking twice about what it’s being used for; or worse, how it can be used against us,” said Moriarty (D-Camden/Gloucester). “This bill helps give consumers more control over their personal information, while allowing companies to collect just enough information to complete transactions and prevent fraudulent activity.”
The bill (A-3946) restricts the way retail establishments may collect and use the personal information contained in the electronic data embedded in identification cards, such as driver’s licenses.
Businesses commonly engage in the practice of “scanning” the barcodes on identification cards for purposes of verifying the authenticity of the card, verifying a consumer’s age and identity, and preventing fraudulent merchandise return practices. Current identity theft law only provides that a consumer and the state police must be notified in the case of a security breach related to a computerized record of personal information.
The bill sets forth the purposes for which identification cards may be scanned by retail establishments and describes the information that may be gathered by scanning. Under the bill, a retail establishment may scan a person’s identification card only for the following purposes:
· to verify the authenticity of the card or to verify the age or identity of the person in certain circumstances;
· to prevent fraud or other criminal activity, in the case of merchandise return or exchange, via a fraud prevention service company or system;
· to establish or maintain a contractual relationship.
· to record, retain, or transmit information as required by state or federal law;
· to transmit information to a consumer reporting agency, financial institution, or debt collector to be used as permitted by federal law; or
· to record, retain, or transmit information by a covered entity governed by medical privacy and security rules established pursuant to federal law.
Information that may be collected is limited to the person’s name, address, date of birth, and identification card number. The bill also specifies that any information collected, which may be retained by a retail establishment, must be securely stored and any security breach of the information must be reported to any affected person and the state police in compliance with current law.
A violation of the bill’s provisions will result in a civil penalty of $2,500 for a first offense and $5,000 for any subsequent offense. Additionally, the bill provides that any person aggrieved by a violation may bring an action in Superior Court to recover damages.
The bill will now be referred to the Senate.