(TRENTON) – To protect the privacy and safety of judicial officers and prosecutors, the full Assembly on Thursday voted 79-0 to approve legislation to prohibit their home addresses and telephone numbers from being posted online.
Under the bill (A-1649), sponsored by Assembly Democrats Annette Quijano (D-Union), Yvonne Lopez, Assembly Speaker Craig Coughlin (both D-Middlesex) and Ralph Caputo (D-Essex), individuals, State and local agencies, and businesses would be prohibited from posting or publishing home addresses and phone numbers of judicial officers and federal, State, county or municipal prosecutors, regardless of whether they are currently working or retired, as well as their spouse or child. Specifically, the bill would amend the current law that prohibits such disclosure for law enforcement officers.
Additionally, the measure would make it a crime of the third degree for a person to knowingly and purposefully post this information online to expose another to harassment or risk of harm to life or property. A third degree crime is punishable by three to five years in prison, a fine of $15,000, or both.
If a person posts the information online with reckless disregard for the risks it may cause to another, it would be a crime of the fourth degree punishable by up to 18 months in person, a fine of $10,000, or both.
Under the bill, the home addresses of law enforcement officers, judicial officers and prosecutors would be redacted from government records before a document is provided to a member of the public through the Open Public Records Act.
If the home address of a law enforcement officer, judicial officer or prosecutor is posted online, they may request the person or entity that disclosed the information to remove it. If the information is not removed in a timely manner, the affected individual could bring civil action in Superior Court.
After the attack at the New Jersey home of federal Judge Esther Salas this summer, it was discovered that the shooter had found her home address online. This legislation would be known as ‘Daniel’s Law’ after Judge Salas’ son, Daniel Anderl, who lost his life in the attack.
The measure’s sponsors released the following joint statement on the bill:
“Making tough decisions is part of the job for judges and prosecutors. Sometimes these decisions aren’t popular, and they become a target. It’s frightening to think that disgruntled individuals may be able to find their home addresses and personal phone numbers readily available at the touch of a button.
“Our hearts continue to break for Judge Salas and her family. The goal of this bill is to better protect the privacy of judges and prosecutors by prohibiting their personal addresses and contact information from being shared online without their consent.”